The Denver Post. The relationship of self-reported sex-role characteristics and attitudes toward homosexuality. They are socially prescribed and can change over time emedicine. In addition, the field of bioethics has shown the importance of exploring potential dangers and benefits of discovering the genetic bases for many psychosocial phenomena; therefore, a focus on the public's understanding of the ramifications of genetic explanations for homosexuality will expand this important literature.
Find articles by Toby Epstein Jayaratne. Burns, Jr.
Retrieved 10 June Psychology of Women Quarterly. The Indianapolis Star. Surgery United States. Sheldon, Ph. They are socially prescribed and can change over time emedicine. As stated previously, some respondents asserted that homosexuality is totally genetic:.
Reality changed with the passing of child-labor laws, reality changed with the Wright brothers, etc. Rork Kuick Tue, Jun 25, : p. The conservative religious community has shown again and again how willing they are to knife them in the back.
She hammered state attorneys with tough questions and demanded an explanation of the difference banning same-sex marriage and prohibiting interracial marriage, which was prevalent in many states until a U. Exactly seldon! Make a Payment. What is more important than civil rights? Marriage has nothing to do with procreation, that is sex.
See also Same-sex union legislation Same-sex union court cases Timeline of same-sex marriage Recognition of same-sex unions in Africa Recognition of same-sex unions in Asia Recognition of same-sex unions in Europe Recognition of same-sex unions in the Americas Recognition of same-sex unions in Oceania Marriage privatization Divorce of same-sex couples Domestic partnership Military policy Adoption Listings by country LGBT rights by country or territory.
Understanding women's sexualities and sexual orientations: An introduction. How Information That Homosexuality Is Partly Genetic Could Be Used to Harm People Although 10 participants did not know how information about the genetic cause of homosexuality could be used to harm people and 12 respondents believed that there would be nothing harmful about such knowledge, most participants gave specific examples of how such genetic information could be harmful.
Negative attitudes toward homosexuality contributed to other responses, as well.